Fillings option for treating tooth decay in children.

Fillings option for treating tooth decay in children.

Washington: Fillings may not be the best way to handle tooth decay in children, suggests a study.

Findings from a major dental trial imply that preventing tooth decay from occurring in the first place is the most effective way for parents to help avoid pain and infection from decay in their children’s teeth.

The biggest of its kind thus far, the trial , also discovered that 450 children who participate in the study experienced tooth decay and pain, regardless of which sort of dental treatment they received.

‘Our analysis shows that every way of treating corrosion worked to a similar degree but that children who get tooth decay at a young age have a higher chance of undergoing toothache and abscesses regardless of the way in which the dentist handles the rust,’ said Professor Nicola Innes, Chair of Paediatric Dentistry at the University of Dundee and lead writer.

‘What’s absolutely clear from our trial is the best method to handle tooth decay isn’t by drilling it out or putting it — it’s by preventing it in the first place,’ lasted Innes from the paper printed in the Journal of Dental Research. During the analysis, dentists operating throughout the country recruited more than 1,140 kids with visible tooth decay between the ages of three and seven.

One of the three treatment approaches was chosen randomly for the trial, which had been around three years’ length for every child hygiene.
The very first approach prevents putting any fillings and aimed to prevent new decay by reducing sugar consumption, ensuring twice-daily brushing with fluoridated toothpaste, application of fluoride varnish and placing of fissure sealants on the very first permanent molar (back) teeth.

The second alternative involved drilling tooth decay out, which was based upon what has been considered the standard’drill and fill’ practice with treatments together for more than 50 decades. The next therapy approach was a minimally invasive approach where tooth decay was sealed in below a filling or a metal crown to prevent it progressing with preventative treatments.

The main trial findings found no evidence to indicate that any of those treatment strategies were greater than another in terms of making a difference in quality of life children’s experience of pain or disease or dental anxiety between groups. All 3 different ways of treating corrosion were acceptable to kids, parents and dental professionals.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *